Archetypical Content
Archetypical Content
Embedded Files
Introduction
Introduction
Welcome to our interactive tool that explores the diverse perspectives of academics through synthetic social media responses. By leveraging a vast dataset of social media posts categorized by user archetypes, we aim to provide insights into how different academic groups react to various topics and events. This page will guide you through the purpose, methodology, and ethical considerations of our project, as well as provide examples of archetypal responses.
Purpose
Purpose
The goal of this project is to understand the ideological and communicative patterns of various academic archetypes. By simulating social media responses, we can explore how different groups within academia may perceive and discuss key issues. This tool offers a unique way to compare and contrast these perspectives, providing valuable insights for researchers, educators, and the public.
Considerations and Ethics
Considerations and Ethics
While this tool provides intriguing insights, it is important to use it responsibly. The synthetic responses are based on data patterns and do not reflect the views of real individuals. We recognize the risk of stereotyping and emphasize the need for ethical usage. Users should approach the tool as a means of exploring potential trends rather than definitive truths about any group.
Methodology
Methodology
Our approach involves the following steps:
Data Collection: We gathered social media posts from a diverse range of academics, categorized by characteristics such as geographical location, field of expertise, and social media reach.
Data Processing: The posts were analyzed and categorized by stance (e.g., pro, anti, neutral) on various topics (e.g., Climate Action, Economic Collectivism, Cultural Liberalism).
Synthetic Response Generation: Using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model, we generate synthetic social media responses, grounded on actual tweets by academics of various archetypes. The model uses a JSON file containing categorized posts to ensure responses align with observed patterns for each archetype.
Possible Archetypes
Possible Archetypes
Our tool allows exploration of various archetypes. Some examples include:
US based academic in the humanities that is using self-centred toxic language
Female academic with high twitter reach and high academic credibility
Climate Expert
Toxic economist
Example Archetypal Responses
Example Archetypal Responses
Below, you can explore synthetic responses to a sample headline by different archetypes. Use the dropdown to select the headline and see some example archetype academics and how their response might differ.
This feature provides a deeper understanding of the diverse perspectives within the academic community.
Headline #1: "EXCLUSIVE Lawyers charging £10,000 to make fake asylum claims: Special investigation exposes staff at immigration law firms briefing clients on how to LIE to the authorities to win the right to stay in Britain."
Source: Daily Mail
Headline #1: "EXCLUSIVE Lawyers charging £10,000 to make fake asylum claims: Special investigation exposes staff at immigration law firms briefing clients on how to LIE to the authorities to win the right to stay in Britain."
Source: Daily Mail
Archetype #1: US based academic in the humanities that is using self-centered toxic language
"Of course lawyers are charging £10,000 for fake asylum claims. The whole immigration system is a joke. Meanwhile, I'm stuck dealing with endless bureaucratic BS to get my legitimate research funding. It's laughable how easily people can manipulate the system while those of us contributing to society jump through hoops. Total disgrace! 😡"
Archetype #2: Female academic with high twitter reach and high academic credibility:
"Shameful to see exploitation is happening within the legal system. Forcing people to lie for asylum only erodes trust in the entire process. We need stricter regulation and accountability for those who manipulate vulnerable individuals. True reform starts with protecting integrity and upholding justice for all."
Archetype #3: Climate Expert
"Reading headlines like this makes it clear how deep biases and misinformation can go. The real tragedy is how such tactics distract from crucial issues, including the increasing displacement due to climate change. The current refugee crisis is just a precursor to what unchecked climate change might bring. We need to focus on real solutions, not scapegoats."
Archetype #4: Toxic economist
"Seems like some lawyers and their 'clients' are cashing in big on scamming the UK's asylum system. This only strengthens the argument for stricter immigration controls and an overhaul of the current policies. We're being taken for fools, and it's costing us dearly."
Headline #2: "NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Spies China’s Chang’e 6 Spacecraft on Far Side of the Moon"
Source: SciTechDaily
Headline #2: "NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Spies China’s Chang’e 6 Spacecraft on Far Side of the Moon"
Source: SciTechDaily
Archetype #1: Racist Academic
"Is it any wonder we're falling behind in STEM fields when we prioritize diversity over raw talent? Look at China making strides on the moon while we're bogged down with immigration. Focus on merit, not political correctness. "
Archetype #2: High Reach - High Credibility Academic
""Fascinating collaboration between NASA and China's space program witnessed on the far side of the Moon! The #LunarReconnaissanceOrbiter captures Chang’e 6 in action. A step forward in global space exploration and scientific diplomacy."
Archetype #3: Egocentric Academic
"Ah yes, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter playing 'peekaboo' with China's Chang’e 6 on the far side of the moon. Such monumental discoveries, but when will they recognize my groundbreaking research? Always the bridesmaid, never the bride! 😂🌝"
Archetype #1: Conservative US-based Male Academic
"Hezbollah’s credibility is in shambles amid the current escalation. It's high time we stop playing into their hands and recognize the true threat they pose. Weak leadership and terrorist politics can't be trusted."
Archetype #2: Expert on Cultural issues using emotional language
"Watching Hezbollah's credibility crumble amid the escalation is both heartbreaking and infuriating. How long will the people suffer under this betrayal? Our world craves peace and justice, not oppression and deceit."
Archetype #3: Expert on Cultural issues using cognitive language
"Hezbollah is facing a significant credibility crisis amid ongoing escalations. As someone who closely examines cultural narratives, it's clear that the group's actions are becoming increasingly scrutinized not just politically, but socially. This situation underscores how cultural legitimacy can shift quickly in response to geopolitical pressures."
Archetype #4: Liberal Economist
"Hezbollah’s actions continue to destabilize the region, but we must recognize that socio-economic interventions, not just military solutions, are crucial. The peoples' trust can only be reclaimed through addressing systemic poverty and inequality. Economic reforms and welfare policies could undermine Hezbollah’s influence by offering tangible alternatives to the marginalized communities they exploit"
Archetype #1: Self-centered Liberal Humanities Academic
"Modi's election results labeled as a moral defeat emphasize the growing disillusionment. It's a call for academia and intellectuals to explore the intricate causes and effects. Understanding the socio-political dynamics and public sentiment is crucial for crafting informed perspectives and policies that resonate with the diverse fabric of our society"
Archetype #2: Toxic Indian academic
"Congress labeling Modi's election results as a 'moral defeat' is ludicrous. The real focus should be on policy impact and economic performance, not partisan rhetoric. Strengthening India’s economic foundation through conservative principles will speak louder than political squabbles."
Archetype #3: Expert on Cultural issues using cognitive language
"Congress declaring the election results a moral defeat for Modi speaks volumes about the current political climate in India. This sentiment highlights the growing need for transparency, accountability, and governance that truly reflects the people's will. The emphasis now should shift towards inclusive and transparent governance to heal the divides and build a more equitable society."
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse